Comments on: Harpending on Illegitimacy: Blush on the Cheeks of Reality http://www.welmer.org/2009/06/15/harpending-on-illegitimacy-blush-on-the-cheeks-of-reality/ Exploring the East, Revisiting the West Tue, 18 Jan 2011 22:44:41 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 By: joel http://www.welmer.org/2009/06/15/harpending-on-illegitimacy-blush-on-the-cheeks-of-reality/comment-page-1/#comment-2373 joel Sat, 20 Jun 2009 23:17:34 +0000 http://www.welmer.org/?p=264#comment-2373 Problem understood. Solution anyone? Problem understood.

Solution anyone?

]]> By: miles http://www.welmer.org/2009/06/15/harpending-on-illegitimacy-blush-on-the-cheeks-of-reality/comment-page-1/#comment-2296 miles Thu, 18 Jun 2009 14:55:25 +0000 http://www.welmer.org/?p=264#comment-2296 Welmer, Matriarchies are left-wing societies. Thats why leftists are trying to implement one upon us through backdoor means. We "had" a patriarchy, but as soon as you take the kids from their dad and give them to mom, and make dad pay a mint for it, while aiding mom with taxpayer dough..................your are creating incentives to build a matriarchy with a sub-replacement birthrate (which you intend to fufill with left-wing leaning immigrants from more matriarichal cultures). The left's social policy has been attempting to build the social-sexual concoction we are getting now for years. They knew what they were doing all along. Welmer,

Matriarchies are left-wing societies. Thats why leftists are trying to implement one upon us through backdoor means.

We “had” a patriarchy, but as soon as you take the kids from their dad and give them to mom, and make dad pay a mint for it, while aiding mom with taxpayer dough………………your are creating incentives to build a matriarchy with a sub-replacement birthrate (which you intend to fufill with left-wing leaning immigrants from more matriarichal cultures). The left’s social policy has been attempting to build the social-sexual concoction we are getting now for years. They knew what they were doing all along.

]]> By: Puma http://www.welmer.org/2009/06/15/harpending-on-illegitimacy-blush-on-the-cheeks-of-reality/comment-page-1/#comment-2253 Puma Wed, 17 Jun 2009 03:37:36 +0000 http://www.welmer.org/?p=264#comment-2253 These same old fools are the same standard-issue ones that brought us today's crop of family laws. These are the morons who voted them in while holding seats of power in state legislatures. These same old fools are the same standard-issue ones that brought us today’s crop of family laws. These are the morons who voted them in while holding seats of power in state legislatures.

]]> By: novaseeker http://www.welmer.org/2009/06/15/harpending-on-illegitimacy-blush-on-the-cheeks-of-reality/comment-page-1/#comment-2238 novaseeker Tue, 16 Jun 2009 14:28:12 +0000 http://www.welmer.org/?p=264#comment-2238 You put your finger on the problem, Welmer: "chivalric myths". This will be my exhibit B. You put your finger on the problem, Welmer: “chivalric myths”.

This will be my exhibit B.

]]> By: Lukobe http://www.welmer.org/2009/06/15/harpending-on-illegitimacy-blush-on-the-cheeks-of-reality/comment-page-1/#comment-2225 Lukobe Tue, 16 Jun 2009 05:49:42 +0000 http://www.welmer.org/?p=264#comment-2225 Not <i>all</i> good women want high-T alphas. I should know! Not all good women want high-T alphas. I should know!

]]> By: whiskey http://www.welmer.org/2009/06/15/harpending-on-illegitimacy-blush-on-the-cheeks-of-reality/comment-page-1/#comment-2224 whiskey Tue, 16 Jun 2009 05:14:59 +0000 http://www.welmer.org/?p=264#comment-2224 The problem with Harpending, with Sailer, with Michael Blowhard, with Glenn Reynolds, with most older male commenters is that their own direct experience with women was around 1965-1985. After which they got married. As such, they were not exposed, constantly to the brutal reality of the dating market, relationships, and what drives them: women's demand for highly dominant, high-T men. They're walled off from current reality. In their own little enclave. They view all women as being like their wives (or daughters) and have little contact with the ugly reality of unconstrained female sexuality (which like all human desires male or female, when unconstrained is a disaster). The past really is another country. The problem with Harpending, with Sailer, with Michael Blowhard, with Glenn Reynolds, with most older male commenters is that their own direct experience with women was around 1965-1985. After which they got married.

As such, they were not exposed, constantly to the brutal reality of the dating market, relationships, and what drives them: women’s demand for highly dominant, high-T men.

They’re walled off from current reality. In their own little enclave. They view all women as being like their wives (or daughters) and have little contact with the ugly reality of unconstrained female sexuality (which like all human desires male or female, when unconstrained is a disaster).

The past really is another country.

]]>