Comments on: Kristoff Shilling for his Wife at NY Times http://www.welmer.org/2009/08/20/kristoff-shilling-for-his-wife-at-ny-times/ Exploring the East, Revisiting the West Tue, 18 Jan 2011 22:44:41 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 By: miles http://www.welmer.org/2009/08/20/kristoff-shilling-for-his-wife-at-ny-times/comment-page-1/#comment-4315 miles Sat, 22 Aug 2009 01:10:24 +0000 http://www.welmer.org/?p=451#comment-4315 oh if Carlos Slim simply hadn't given the Times that loan... I would -really- enjoy seeing Bob Herbert, Kristoff, PAUL (slug) KRUGMAN, Smarmeen Loud, David (neoconservative phoney-trotskyite) Brooks, Frank Rich (weenie-man), Thomas Friedman, and Senoir Cohen all have to get jobs outside that paper...... I love how the Slimes gets to trot out what-should-be-discredited hacks like Thomas Friedman as "experts" over and over. I wish newspaper syndicates were completely illegal. I wish no one person was even allowed to own stock in multiple newspapers. The news is too important to let a syndicate like Gannett to control so many papers and force opinion writers like those above on us in second-tier cities. I turn to the local editorial page and see the mugs of those above and it makes me sick. Nobody in my part of the world really give a tinker's damn about what these smug schmucks think except the extremely status-worshipping swipple-sell-out-slime. They follow them like the readers of Ayn Rand's literally creation, Ellsworth Toohey's column, "One Small Voice", swalling whole everything they say with no thought of their own. "Our betters have decided for us". Fuck that shit. I'll think for myself. If you can't tell, I dislike the Pravda-on-the-Hudson somewhat. oh if Carlos Slim simply hadn’t given the Times that loan…

I would -really- enjoy seeing Bob Herbert, Kristoff, PAUL (slug) KRUGMAN, Smarmeen Loud, David (neoconservative phoney-trotskyite) Brooks, Frank Rich (weenie-man), Thomas Friedman, and Senoir Cohen all have to get jobs outside that paper……

I love how the Slimes gets to trot out what-should-be-discredited hacks like Thomas Friedman as “experts” over and over.

I wish newspaper syndicates were completely illegal. I wish no one person was even allowed to own stock in multiple newspapers. The news is too important to let a syndicate like Gannett to control so many papers and force opinion writers like those above on us in second-tier cities. I turn to the local editorial page and see the mugs of those above and it makes me sick. Nobody in my part of the world really give a tinker’s damn about what these smug schmucks think except the extremely status-worshipping swipple-sell-out-slime. They follow them like the readers of Ayn Rand’s literally creation, Ellsworth Toohey’s column, “One Small Voice”, swalling whole everything they say with no thought of their own. “Our betters have decided for us”. Fuck that shit. I’ll think for myself.

If you can’t tell, I dislike the Pravda-on-the-Hudson somewhat.

]]> By: whiskey http://www.welmer.org/2009/08/20/kristoff-shilling-for-his-wife-at-ny-times/comment-page-1/#comment-4302 whiskey Fri, 21 Aug 2009 05:07:53 +0000 http://www.welmer.org/?p=451#comment-4302 This is the mark of a corrupt aristocracy. It's inbred. Much of the feminist influence is merely the female half of aristocracy exerting itself. Which is also the mark of a corrupt and inbred aristocracy. Women of course, love aristocracies. All dream of being Princesses. This is the mark of a corrupt aristocracy. It’s inbred. Much of the feminist influence is merely the female half of aristocracy exerting itself. Which is also the mark of a corrupt and inbred aristocracy.

Women of course, love aristocracies. All dream of being Princesses.

]]> By: novaseeker http://www.welmer.org/2009/08/20/kristoff-shilling-for-his-wife-at-ny-times/comment-page-1/#comment-4289 novaseeker Thu, 20 Aug 2009 14:55:47 +0000 http://www.welmer.org/?p=451#comment-4289 Yep. His wife is the ideological driver there. I have observed Kristoff since he was the beat reporter for the NYT in Beijing, and he has become progressively more feminist, no doubt due to her influence. It's of course no surprise that he is hawking investment in third world women since this is his wife's line of work. Yep. His wife is the ideological driver there. I have observed Kristoff since he was the beat reporter for the NYT in Beijing, and he has become progressively more feminist, no doubt due to her influence. It’s of course no surprise that he is hawking investment in third world women since this is his wife’s line of work.

]]> By: Clarence http://www.welmer.org/2009/08/20/kristoff-shilling-for-his-wife-at-ny-times/comment-page-1/#comment-4285 Clarence Thu, 20 Aug 2009 14:00:13 +0000 http://www.welmer.org/?p=451#comment-4285 Oh, I don't know, Welmer. It seems microfinancing can work, at least in some individual cases and in the larger sense if it goes to certain things like agriculture. However, I readily agree most microfinance is not going this way, and "female empowerment" microfinance loans might help some women individually but they will not be beneficial to the societies in the long run. Oh, I don’t know, Welmer.

It seems microfinancing can work, at least in some individual cases and in the larger sense if it goes to certain things like agriculture. However, I readily agree most microfinance is not going this way, and “female empowerment” microfinance loans might help some women individually but they will not be beneficial to the societies in the long run.

]]>